<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Get A Professional Website Online Within One Week, For Less Than $199, And No Design Experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hostnexus.com/blog/how-to-get-a-professional-website-online-within-one-week-for-less-than-199-and-no-design-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hostnexus.com/blog/how-to-get-a-professional-website-online-within-one-week-for-less-than-199-and-no-design-experience/</link>
	<description>Status Updates, Rants, Musings and Real Advice for Webmasters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elden Armbrust</title>
		<link>http://www.hostnexus.com/blog/how-to-get-a-professional-website-online-within-one-week-for-less-than-199-and-no-design-experience/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Elden Armbrust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hostnexus.com/blog/?p=464#comment-593</guid>
		<description>One thing that isn&#039;t touched on here, and is actually quite insulting to designers like myself, is that those cheap logos you purchase may not be able to be trademarked due to no trademark/copyright search being performed, and the logo being reused multiple times.  No company should EVER consider a logo designer that will not run the necessary queries.  Additionally, it seems as though the sites mentioned focus on raster-based logos.  That works fine for a single purpose, but if you intend to use your logo in print or publication then you should be leaning towards vector artwork.  Just slapping a 20 in some guys hands and hoping for the best can actually end up costing you MUCH more down the road than paying a REAL developer for REAL work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that isn&#8217;t touched on here, and is actually quite insulting to designers like myself, is that those cheap logos you purchase may not be able to be trademarked due to no trademark/copyright search being performed, and the logo being reused multiple times.  No company should EVER consider a logo designer that will not run the necessary queries.  Additionally, it seems as though the sites mentioned focus on raster-based logos.  That works fine for a single purpose, but if you intend to use your logo in print or publication then you should be leaning towards vector artwork.  Just slapping a 20 in some guys hands and hoping for the best can actually end up costing you MUCH more down the road than paying a REAL developer for REAL work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

